Case study · Wearable

TrailMate

A connected bracelet system designed to make solo hiking safer.

  • Idle — white
  • Confirmation — green
  • Warning — yellow
  • Distress — red
Hiker wearing the TrailMate bracelet outdoors
Team
Group of 4
Context
Prototyping in Interaction Design, Chalmers
Methods
Low-fi prototyping, Wizard-of-Oz, Arduino
Year
2024
01 · Hero
Project overview video explaining the full TrailMate concept, how it works, and the key interactions.

Solo hiking is often avoided out of fear of harassment, injury, or getting lost — a barrier that falls disproportionately on women and other minority groups. TrailMate is a two-way bracelet system, one for the hiker and one for a trusted partner at home, that keeps both sides quietly aware of each other and lets either one raise an alert.

02Problem

Solo hiking isn't equally safe for everyone

Hiking is often described as a benefit to health, but not everybody gets to enjoy it as freely. Women, queer people, people of colour and other minority groups are underrepresented in solo hiking, partly from fear of harassment and partly from fear of accidental injury or getting lost.

The research question driving the project: how can a wearable device favour solo hikers, fostering a sense of companionship and improving both safety and emotional well-being during their hikes?

Contribution split

Tarek — individual: filmed and edited the project video, including the final video montage

Shared (team of 4)

Full design process — research, ideation, prototyping and testing

03Research & ideation

From social sports to solo hiking

Concept sketches
Early concept sketches

Mind-mapping social sports narrowed the focus to hiking, then to women and minorities who hike solo. Ideas came from 6-3-5 brainwriting — three sketches per member, voted on by the group.

The two top ideas — a check-in bracelet and a health-status ring — were merged into one bracelet system, chosen for comfort and clearer colour visibility while hiking.

04Iteration

Tape, paper and string first

A low-fidelity prototype came first: two bracelets built from tape, paper, string and pearls, one for the hiker and one for the partner, the partner's bracelet operated with a Wizard-of-Oz technique — pulling different coloured paper through it to simulate status changes. Two semi-structured interviews (three women, one man, ages 20–30) tested the concept against a written hiking scenario.

Feedback reshaped the design for the working prototype: the two separate bracelets were merged into a single unit, the emergency self-indication tag was dropped in favour of a simpler interface, and a new "warning" mode was added for situations between a routine check-in and full distress. The feedback system was expanded to auditory, haptic and visual signals together, and GPS coordinates are sent as an SMS rather than only shown on the bracelet.

The working prototype ran on an Arduino Uno with a button and an LED strip cycling white, green, yellow and red. The band was hand-sewn from fabric sized to hold the LED strip, button and wiring; the links covering the LED strip were modelled in Fusion 360 and 3D printed in transparent PLA, designed to click together and rotate independently so the band could wrap the wrist.

Figure 2 — Low-fidelity prototype, tape and string
Low-fidelity prototype
Figure 3 — Building the LED and button circuit
Circuit build
05Working prototype

Four states, two bracelets

Figure 4 — Interaction and feedback table for hiker and partner bracelets
Interaction table
Figure 5 — The four status states: idle, confirmation, warning, distress
Idle
Idle — white
Default state, nothing pending
Confirmation
Confirmation — green
Both bracelets flash green once a check-in is answered, then return to idle
Warning
Warning — yellow
The hiker flags a possible risk before it becomes an emergency — the partner's bracelet turns yellow, the hiker's blinks and vibrates once
Distress
Distress — red
Triggered by holding the button for three seconds — vibrates, sounds, and sends the hiker's GPS coordinates to the partner by SMS
Figure 6 — (a) The idle state of a hikers' smart bracelet
Idle state, hiker's bracelet
Figure 7 — (b) The connected partner bracelet
Connected partner bracelet
Figure 8 — Hikers bracelet in hike-mode
Hikers bracelet in hike-mode
Figure 9 — Partner bracelet in home-mode
Partner bracelet in home-mode
06Before / after

What the pilot interviews changed

Both changes came directly out of the pilot interviews.

Before

Two separate bracelets, an emergency self-indication tag, and status shown only through colour.

Users didn't want to buy or carry two different devices, and colour alone excluded people who couldn't rely on sight.

After

One merged bracelet design, an added warning mode, and status through colour, vibration and sound together.

A single unit and a middle alert level matched how people actually wanted to signal; redundant feedback channels meant no one mode had to carry the whole message.

07Accessibility

Sound, touch and light together

The feedback system was refined to combine auditory, haptic and visual signals so no single channel carried the whole message and people with disabilities weren't excluded. GPS coordinates are sent as an SMS text message rather than shown only on a small screen, since phones can read texts aloud for people who are visually impaired.

08Reflection

How four students described it

The working prototype was evaluated through two semi-structured group interviews with four students aged 20–30. Asked to describe the product in one word, participants used: effective, comforting, direct, connected, safety, responsibility, and "peace of mind".

Opinions split on the red distress light — some felt it could scare off a potential attacker, others worried it would make the situation more dangerous by revealing the alert. Participants also asked for a more discreet form, suggesting a necklace or ring instead of a visible bracelet, and raised questions about battery life and indication.

Left for future work: further evaluation of a mid-fidelity prototype before committing to high-fidelity builds, a more delicate physical design, and deeper testing of whether a visible alert helps or endangers the hiker in a real confrontation.

Download full report (PDF)